Thesis – Littlewood’s Conjecture
The proof of inequality by mathematical induction
The proof of inequality by mathematical induction
Noah Stephens-Davidowitz
torus is a surface having genus one
torus is a surface having genus one
mathematica graphing a 2 by 2 matrix as an object
is there a possibility to “transform” a matrix (inheriting the input-output “weights”) into a graph object inheriting the matrix relations?
you can convert it to an edge-weighted graph using WeightedAdjacencyGraph
. This will give you a complete graph (a Graph
expression) in which each vertex is also connected to itself. I am not sure how much sense it makes treat this matrix as a graph, given the full connectivity.
Since you have a fully connected graph, it does not matter in your case, but be aware that WeightedAdjacencyGraph
represents missing edges with Infinity
, not with zero. This is somewhat annoying because it is inconsistent with WeightedAdjacencyMatrix
, which uses 0
. While Infinity
does make sense in some (not all) applications, it is much more common to see data that uses 0.
via [✓] Convert matrix into “Graph object”? – Online Technical Discussion Groups—Wolfram Community
Geometry of Linear Transformations of the Plane – HMC Calculus Tutorial
Rotations
Source: Geometry of Linear Transformations of the Plane – HMC Calculus Tutorial