# Thesis – Littlewood’s Conjecture

# The proof of inequality by mathematical induction

# The proof of inequality by mathematical induction

# Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

# torus is a surface having genus one

torus is a surface having genus one

# mathematica graphing a 2 by 2 matrix as an object

is there a possibility to “transform” a matrix (inheriting the input-output “weights”) into a graph object inheriting the matrix relations?

you can convert it to an edge-weighted graph using `WeightedAdjacencyGraph`

. This will give you a complete graph (a `Graph`

expression) in which each vertex is also connected *to itself*. I am not sure how much sense it makes treat this matrix as a graph, given the full connectivity.

Since you have a fully connected graph, it does not matter in your case, but be aware that `WeightedAdjacencyGraph`

represents missing edges with `Infinity`

, not with zero. This is somewhat annoying because it is inconsistent with `WeightedAdjacencyMatrix`

, which uses `0`

. While `Infinity`

does make sense in *some* (not all) applications, it is much more common to see data that uses 0.

via [✓] Convert matrix into “Graph object”? – Online Technical Discussion Groups—Wolfram Community

# Geometry of Linear Transformations of the Plane – HMC Calculus Tutorial

Rotations

Source: Geometry of Linear Transformations of the Plane – HMC Calculus Tutorial